Quantcast


Archive for the ‘water quality’ Category

coursing-waters-brenda-jones

Coursing Waters, Brenda Jones

The most impactful response I have seen to Hurricane Irene comes from Jim Waltman, Executive Director of the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association.  Since 1949, this farsighted, crusading organization has assiduously and effectively taught us about the power, importance and threatened condition of water in our region.  They have taken giant steps at every possible level to safeguard our waterways.

Now, due to accelerated climate change, it could be seen as ironic that Jim has to teach us how to protect ourselves from water!

I wrote Jim Waltman, immediately upon seeing his “Lessons from Hurricane Irene” in a number of print publications.  He graciously gave me permission to share it with NJ WILD readers here and abroad.  At the last tally, people are reading of nature in our region in ninety countries.  Jim and the Watershed Association are masters at communication, so it is an honor to be able to extend their reach somewhat on this urgent issue.

With Jim Waltman’s kind permission. [bolds mine cfe]

Your water. Your environment. Your voice.
Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association
31 Titus Mill Road
Pennington, NJ 08534
(609) 737-3735

http://www.thewatershed.org/.

Lessons from Hurricane Irene

A message from the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association

By: Jim Waltman, Executive Director

By any measure, Hurricane Irene was a monster. Like much of New Jersey, our watershed was hammered by rain, wind, power outages and flooding. Damages from flooding occurred in almost every corner of our 265-square-mile watershed, and in all 26 towns within our region of central New Jersey. The boroughs were hit particularly hard, with large portions of Manville, Millstone and Hightstown under literally feet of water.

The Millstone River and Stony Brook both reached all-time record high levels in various places, each merging with the Delaware & Raritan Canal for a portion of their journeys, and numerous lakes spilled over their banks. Our hearts go out to the thousands of people who lost property, businesses or, worst of all, loved ones in this storm.

autumn-waters-brenda-jones

Normal Autumn Waters, Brenda Jones

As we near the end of yet another wet week, those of us at the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association, central New Jersey’s first environmental group, feel an even greater than usual urgency.

While Hurricane Irene was a true “outlier,” –an enormous storm that would have caused massive flooding and damage no matter what we did to prevent it–, climate scientists are telling us that our region is most likely going to continue to get wetter and wetter (except of course during periods of prolonged drought, which are also likely to become more severe). This means that, –unless we change our mindset, behaviors and policies–, we may be living our future.

However, hope is not lost. Together we can make a difference:

First, we need to stop making the problem worse. Ill-conceived developments near streams and within wetlands, not only damage our supply of clean water and destroy important wildlife habitat, they also dramatically increase the risk of flood damage to homes and businesses.

after-the-deluge-Carolyn Foote Edelmann

‘Our’ Towpath After an August Deluge    cfe

Since 1949, the Watershed Association has sought to reverse that tide. In Cranbury, we are working closely with the Township Committee, Planning Board and Environmental Commission to secure a new ordinance to prohibit new development and [prevent] the clearing of native vegetation near streams. We are working with Hopewell Township to secure a new ordinance to protect our forests, which help absorb and slowly release rain and snow, and hold soil in place with deep root systems that stabilize streambanks and reduce erosion.

We also need to recommit ourselves to preserving open space along stream corridors and steep slopes as a means of both reducing floodwaters and keeping people out of harm’s way from future Irenes.

water-fury-delaware-river-brenda-jones

Water Fury, Brenda Jones

Second, we need to start fixing the mistakes of the past. Developments built before any significant regulation to contain stormwater can be retrofitted to retain runoff and allow it to percolate into our water supply. For example, the redevelopment of the Princeton Junction train station in West Windsor offers the opportunity to fix flooding issues there caused by acres and acres of impervious paved parking.

img_1867 Peaceful Skies Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association  cfe

Peaceful Skies, Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association Trail Walk,  cfe

In nearby Princeton we are working to investigate what can be done to reduce the flooding of Harry’s Brook. It’s not too late to correct past mistakes.

We also need to recognize that it makes sense to move or remove some structures that were built near water bodies and have been repeatedly damaged by flooding. The state’s “Blue Acres” program, a cousin of the more familiar Green Acres Program, provides funding to purchase such flood prone properties.  With bold action, we can prevent unmitigated development from contaminating and depleting our surface and ground water, and creating additional flood hazards.

We wish those still suffering the aftermath of Hurricane Irene a quick and full recovery.

Interviews with Executive Director Jim Waltman are available upon request.
Contact Communications Director Gwen McNamara at (609) 737-3735 x16 or

gmcnamara@thewatershed.org to arrange an interview.

img_1858  The Hobbit Tree  SBMWA Trail Walk cfe

The Hobbit Tree - Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association Trail Walk    cfe

The Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association is central New Jersey’s first environmental group, protecting clean water and the environment through conservation, advocacy, science and education.
Since 1949, the Watershed Association has served a 265-square-mile region drained by the Stony Brook
and Millstone River and spanning 26 towns and five counties. To learn more, visit www.thewatershed.org.



See new information re “Living Our Future” from Jim Waltman of Stony Brook Millstone Watershed below…

flood-waters-brenda-jones

Floodwaters, Brenda Jones

If the Weather Channel promulgates that calumny one more time, I may do what a most respected male friend admitted today - yell at the television.

HURRICANE IRENE AND OTHERS ARE NOT TO BE BLAMED UPON SO-CALLED MOTHER NATURE.  RATHER, UPON EMISSIONS, CO2, BURNING FOSSIL FUELS, AND OTHER EUPHEMISMS FOR HUMAN GREED.

On CNN, of all places, just before Irene’s debut in our neighborhood, I heard a geologist (don’t ask me why they chose that field to discuss the ways of water and wind) answer, simply, almost abruptly, “Well, of course, hurricanes are intensified because of the increasing temperature of the waters due to climate change.”

This is not NEWS to NJ WILD readers. You’ve ‘heard’ me over and over again linking melting glaciers to increased seawater quantities and depths; decreased sea temperatures and therefore altered currents; increased water vapor; increased intensities of weather, and the worst of this at the poles.  All of this fuels wild weather.

OK, it’s a royal pain cleaning up after Irene.  All I can say is, get used to it. And start investing in sustainability and green technology, (which could also help heal the economy), while you’re at it.

I kept a semi-journal, first by lamplight, then by lanternlight.  I did not go out in the storm with my trusty camera.  When I can bring myself to relive those lengthening hours, I may share them with NJ WILD.

Memories are, frankly, turgid.

Waters the color of cafe au lait surged across our Canal Road, scouring the woods as they roared halfway up our steep driveway.  Power was out for nearly 24 hours; no television for days; no internet until nearly the week anniversary of Irene.

Some memories are deeply tragic.  I mourn the loss of that devoted EMT young man, on Rosedale Road’s bridge right below D&R Greenway Land Trust, where I work.  My heart and prayers are with his family every time I drive that road, and whenever I see his smiling face in any of our newspapers or on-line services.

These recurrent, exacerbated and exacerbating storms are no light matter.

Do not fall for the ploys of any media, least of all the Weather Channel, so eager to lay blame for storm damage at the feet of “Mother Nature.”  Heed not the similar ploys of politicians.

Let’s be very clear about the increasingly severe results of ceaseless emissions, of using the verb “believe” in connection with catastrophic climate change, with science itself.

FROM MY FRIEND JIM WALTMAN OF THE STONY BROOK MILLSTONE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION - HE’S BEEN PREACHING ALONG THESE LINES FAR LONGER, AND MORE EFFECTIVELY THAN I.  HEED JIM:

[bolds mine...   cfe]

As we enter what promises to be another wet week, those of us at the Watershed Association feel an even greater than usual urgency. While Irene was a true “outlier,” an enormous storm that would have caused massive flooding and damage no matter what we did to prevent it, climate scientists are telling us that our region is most likely going to continue to get wetter and wetter (except of course during periods of prolonged drought, which are also likely to become more severe). This means unless we change our mindset, behaviors and policies, we may be living our future.

However, hope is not lost. Together we can make a difference:

First, we need to stop making the problem worse. Ill-conceived developments near streams and within wetlands, not only damage our supply of clean water and destroy important wildlife habitat, they also dramatically increase the risk of flood damage to homes and businesses.


Since
1949, the Watershed Association has sought to reverse that tide. In Cranbury, we are working closely with the Township Committee, Planning Board and Environmental Commission to secure a new ordinance to prohibit new development and the clearing of native vegetation near streams. We are working with Hopewell Township to secure a new ordinance to protect our forests, which help absorb and slowly release rain and snow, and hold soil in place with deep root systems that stabilize streambanks and reduce erosion.

We also need to recommit ourselves to preserving open space along stream corridors and steep slopes as a means of both reducing floodwaters and keeping people out of harms way from future Irenes.

Second, we need to start fixing the mistakes of the past. Developments built before any significant regulation to contain stormwater can be retrofitted to retain runoff and allow it to percolate into our water supply. We are working in Princeton to investigate what can be done in this vein to reduce the flooding of Harry’s Brook.

We also need to recognize that it makes sense to move or remove some structures that were built near water bodies and have been repeatedly damaged by flooding. The state’s “Blue Acres” program, a cousin of the more familiar Green Acres program, provides funding to purchase-from willing sellers-”properties (including structures) that have been damaged by, or may be prone to incurring damage caused by, storms or storm-related flooding, or that may buffer or protect other lands from such damage.”

With bold action, we can prevent unmitigated development from contaminating and depleting our surface and ground water, and creating additional flood hazards. We thank you for your support in our work to implement those bold actions.

We wish those still suffering the aftermath of Hurricane Irene a quick and full recovery.

(Image: Jim Waltman Signature)
Jim Waltman
Executive Director

Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association
Your water. Your environment. Your voice.
P.S. - Many of you have asked how the Watershed Reserve fared in the storm. We feel fortunate that we were relatively unscathed here. With 930-acres we lost our share of trees and the educational dock at Wargo Pond needs some mending, but our Nature Center and buildings were unharmed and our trails mostly passable. Thank you to all who expressed concern and please visit us again soon!


“So the idea from afar that only a few hundred birds really got badly oiled turns out to have been a false sense of security.”  Cornell Lab of Ornithology Director, John Fitzpatrick

bl-skimmer-skimming-smithsonian

Black Skimmer Skimming - in Clean Water — Smithsonian

NJ WILD readers know how I fret over the fate of every wild creature, from the slain beavers of Princeton’s Pettoranello Gardens/Mountain Lakes ‘Preserve’, to all the winged beings harmed, starved, oiled, killed by the oils of the ceaseless volcano from the so-called Deepwater Horizon last year.

So many waterbirds and shorebirds were breeding, nesting, and/or feeding young, as that foul spewing continued and expanded, well, exPLOded in the normally fecund and to me always sacred waters of our Gulf.

great-blue-heron-flight-lake-carnegie-brenda-jones-jpg

Great Blue Heron Flies over Clean Lake Carnegie - Brenda Jones

You also know that my deepest alarm is that no experts from elsewhere showed up to solve and resolve. Not only did BP not know (or care) what to do.  Our American government was powerless, able only to urge tourists to come by and tromp the oiled beaches for the sake of motel and restaurant owners.  No one anywhere knew or knows how to resolve an oil disaster.

Any more than anyone anywhere knows what to do about quaked and flooded Fukushima nuclear plant in shattered northern Japan.

Remember the lies?  Remember 500 barrels a day in the Gulf?  Remember that I told you, watch and see how those numbers tiptoe upwards in the days, weeks and months ahead?

Remember whatever the Japanese were admitting?  At best, at the beginning, the reactors were called compromised.  The term melt was not part of their vocabulary in the early days. Somewhere there must be a school officials attend, teaching how to lie calmly to all who have the right to know.  Teaching how to show up days or weeks later with band-aids for ruptures of the highest magnitude to the fabric of our world.

Last night, on CNN, I heard that there have been “melt-downs or melt-throughs” in three of the four reactors of Fukushima.

And where is that radiation going?  Into our skies…  Into our ocean — for there is really only ONE ocean.  Into our fish and water mammals such as dolphins and whales.  Turtles.  Plankton.  As the Gulf’s oil spewing destroyed everything from the most microscopic to behemoths of the deep.

No one knows.  No one tells.

roseate-spoonbill-archangel from Internet

Roseate Spoonbill near Clean Water - from Internet

Here is the Cornell Ornithology Lab on the Gulf disaster, one year later.  Even THEY are heedless enough to call those millions of barrels or gallons - what difference to the migrating and breeding birds? — a ’spill’…

Nonetheless, I’m glad there’s a Cornell Lab of Ornithology to address these issues and go to the trouble to have articles written and published on the peril of creatures in our time, especially birds.

However, as a subscriber to their Living Bird Magazine, I have watched this disaster played down in those glossy pages.  We have no way of knowing the death toll of birds, let alone plankton and other nearly invisible but essential sea organisms.  The red knots who feed on horseshoe crabs in New Jersey are down 5000 this year, when I believe there were only about 15,000 known individuals tallied last year.  Did red knots migrate over the Gulf at a critical time, perishing either directly or from consuming poisoned foods?

Gradually, in this article below, realization of the deep inner costs, the hidden, the invisible, the untallyable seems to be seeping in, at least in the world of ornithologists.

Not, however, in the world of oil and business - our new golden calf.  The altar upon whose slab we are all Abraham, raising the sword over our sons, Isaac…

Viewpoint: The Oil Spill, One Year Later

One year after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Cornell Lab of Ornithology director John Fitzpatrick discusses what we learned, and what we can take away from it.

Q: What is your reaction when you look back at footage of birds videotaped along the Gulf Coast by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s team during the oil spill?

(put quotes around that noun “spill”, everyone… cfe)

A: It hit me that this event took place at the mouth of one of the world’s mightiest rivers. What that river produces, down through the Mississippi Delta and out into the Gulf, is literally one of the world’s richest living systems.

That northern gulf is a paradise of creatures from the microscopic up to the size of a pelican and a Great Blue Heron. And we have to remember that the birds are only the thin outer edge that’s visible to us. Those images remind me of the myriad organisms and whole systems living underneath those birds. They are why the birds are there in the first place. All those organisms and systems were also affected by the oil.

Q: Now, one year later, what’s the understanding of how the birds were affected by the oil?

A: We feared a genuine catastrophe, and had the winds, tides, and storms conspired against those colonies of birds, it’s possible that we could have seen truly catastrophic mortality. We didn’t see that. Thousands of birds really did get heavily oiled, but for the most part the bird colonies actually did end up surviving and even producing young.

But what also emerged is that the oil did have really widespread impact at levels that are outside the human perception when we look at them from 500 yards away. It actually wasn’t until our crew returned from the field and looked very closely at the high-definition images that we realized that at the breeding colonies we filmed, almost all the young birds and a huge proportion of the adults had oil on them, even if small amounts. And we noted that a lot of the oil droplets were around their mouths, and even inside their beaks, so they obviously were ingesting it. The health effects of this cannot be measured.

So the idea from afar that only a few hundred birds really got badly oiled turns out to have been a false sense of security.

Tens of thousands of birds, perhaps more, were affected by this oil. The amount of energy they ended up having to expend preening that oil, and the reactions they had to having feathers that weren’t working right, mean that they were devoting an enormous amount of their summer to this nuisance. It must have affected their energy levels, and ultimately their ability to migrate and potentially their ability to even stay alive. So we actually can’t know for sure what the total mortality was from that event, measured over the whole year.

The question is how many additional problems can these populations endure and still persist through time? We take away habitat, we take away opportunities for breeding, we take away their food, and then we add oil spills. Just how much of this can these habitats and organisms take before the system itself collapses?

Q: The images shown on national news were mostly of heavily oiled birds. If the vast majority of birds weren’t affected to this degree, does that distort the impact that the oil had?

A: Our team also filmed heavily oiled birds, including very close-up images of several heavily oiled pelicans, suffering and struggling, and with huge dignity trying desperately to live. As scientists we try to think mainly about populations, not so much about individuals.

But quite frankly, looking right into the eye of a bird suffering from our mistake as much as those pelicans obviously were, makes all of us realize what we ought to owe these birds as individuals.

Q: What about that larger scale of populations and species? How is the world doing?

A: One thing we humans have to acknowledge at this point: There is no place on earth right now that is not affected by the presence of humans and the ecological impacts we have had on this planet. It does not stop there. We have to come to grips with the fact that we’ve imposed perturbations so big that our impact is now widely regarded as the sixth major extinction in the history of the planet. Before humans evolved, there were five major points when life on earth was challenged by extrinsic events, by chemical changes, or by impacts from asteroids and comets. Five different times, huge proportions of the species on earth suddenly disappeared.

The sixth major extinction is underway right now, and unlike the previous five, this one is caused by one of the species that lives on earth, namely us. Hundreds and hundreds of species are known to be gone because of our impact. The actual number is no doubt tens of thousands, because we didn’t even know them before they went extinct. We are causing significant ecological instability on this planet, and the question we must face is, how far is this going to go?

Are we going to come to grips with this at all? Could we actually begin to slow down our impact, and finally halt the impact? Shouldn’t we be doing everything we can—now—to achieve a position of balance in which we humans are living stably side-by-side with those natural systems and species that are left? There is no doubt that the world will be a more joyful place if we can do this.

Q: How do we do that?

A: Well, first we need to have every culture of the world recognize that this goal represents both a responsibility and an opportunity for us.

We need to embrace as a species the idea that we’re going to try to live side-by-side with the systems and the species that are left.

Secondly, as we move toward that vision, we need to be able to measure how we’re doing. And the amazing thing about birds is that they give us this opportunity.

The more we study birds, especially birds that are declining, the more we realize that they’re declining because of some specific things that we’re doing to the landscape. Amazingly enough, we can fix those things and, lo and behold, the birds come back! There are now dozens of great examples. The Kirtland’s Warbler, a bird that was reduced to a couple hundred birds in northern Michigan, is now numbering in the thousands because we discovered what was going wrong. (It lives in a habitat that needs to burn regularly, and it lives in a habitat in which cowbirds were overrunning it because of widespread agricultural practices.)

So we’ve recognized that we humans do have the capacity to jump in and start managing systems in a way that mimics what the natural system was doing. Once we do this, the birds rebound spectacularly. We do have options to actually improve landscapes, not just make them worse.

Q: But if you’re talking about extinctions of thousands of species, will you be able to find out in time what’s going wrong for all of them?

A: The great thing about birds is that they give us a chance to measure how we’re doing in keeping natural systems whole, and we can actually extend this idea to the entire planet.

Birds are so observable and easy to count, and everybody loves watching them, that we’re beginning to realize we can measure in real-time how we’re doing by asking people to report what they see to citizen-science projects on the Internet. Because birds are such sensitive indicators of the health of the environment, we have the opportunity, through watching birds, to measure our effects, to adjust our choices, to decrease the amount of damage we’re doing, and to watch the planet recover, system by system, as we learn the tricks.

So just getting people to watch, and count, and record natural things out their back window, and the idea that we can multiply this by millions across the world, means that we actually are moving toward a system in which we can measure, monitor, and adjust. We can in fact have a brand new relationship with the planet in which we’re using birds to adjust our behavior and make the place healthier.

This idea—that just by observing nature you can end up taking part in the reparations of the damage we’ve produced—is an enormously empowering and exciting opportunity for humankind and its relationship with the planet.

Q: Were citizen-science participants involved in monitoring birds after the oil spill?

A: Yes—and the key is that they were monitoring birds before the oil spill too. Every day people from around the world report their bird sightings to eBird.org, and this creates a real-time, continuously running record of the health of bird populations.

Gulf Coast birders had already been counting birds in their region, and by continuing to monitor birds during and after the spill, they’re helping provide a record to government agencies and BP to assess the damage.

Without the initial baseline data, we would not have been able to say what the effects of the spill were. Baseline data on wildlife is rare, and in this case, birds are giving us some of the best environmental indicators available.

Q: How does this tie in to your work at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology?

A: If there’s one basic thing that the Lab stands for it’s the idea that we have an opportunity to make a difference in how the world is going to be in a hundred, five hundred, a thousand years. The differences that we can make are brought about by the fact that as humans, we are fundamentally curious. We watch. We observe. That’s fundamentally what science is. We’re curious about how nature works, we’re curious about how it’s doing. And the more we look, the more we watch, the more we understand. The Lab is built around the idea that to fix systems, to rescue species, to bring back ecosystems, we need to understand how they work. And if we’re going to bring back things that are disappearing, we need to understand what went wrong.

We can actually figure out what’s going wrong, figure out what the human impact is, change the impact, and watch the system rebound. The Lab’s role in global conservation and biodiversity is to engage in science, to engage in close scrutiny about how nature works, but also to do that using hundreds of thousands of other people to help us.

And of course, birds are fun to watch at the same time. This means that we can even take in personal rewards on a daily basis as we contribute information to the broader good, which in turn creates entire continent-scale solutions.



NJ WILD readers know that my sympathies are with all animals of the wild, by no means limited to New Jersey.  You are accustomed to my urging you to pay attention to and support your local land trusts/preservationists, such as D&R Greenway (where I work), Kingston Greenways, Friends of Princeton Nursery Lands (restoring legendary Princeton Nurseries habitat and buildings in Kingston), Friends of Princeton Open Space and Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed.

Defenders of Wildlife, on the national level, so often speaks what I would urge.  Here they focus on the subject about which you’ve so often read in these virtual pages:  my horror that the world continues to term that volcano of oil  in our sacred ocean, ‘a spill’, and its effects upon the turtles.

Sea turtle deaths, see below, are more than three times the annual average!

Our government, basically, has sat on its hands, allowing BP “business as usual”, while turtles perish and fishermen and shrimpers lose their multi-generational livelihoods, and the sea withers.

Now this, from Defenders of Wildlife.  What will you do about it?

“All that it takes for evil to happen is for good people to do nothing…”

View in Browser |   Donate Now |   Sign Up |   Share:http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=I4170Gx437MICl7ux_kskA.. http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=kyWGpIqgW52okmpDO6gs9w.. http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=SKU-POy01yWpLTxZJ9DB2g..

Take Action

Double Trouble for Sea Turtles

http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=LgFV1ZwW7XFhiMrb6KZ10Q.. Last year’s devastating Deepwater Horizon disaster was a serious blow for sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico. But the catastrophe for the sea turtles hasn’t ended yet.

Already this year, more than 340 dead sea turtles have washed ashore on the Gulf Coast — more than three times the annual average — and the death toll is likely to be much higher. Signs point to shrimp fishing as a likely cause for the spike in deaths — perhaps combined with the lingering effects of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

Yet the government has not taken action to save these animals struggling to survive. Defenders and our conservation partners have launched a lifesaving lawsuit to protect sea turtles, but federal officials need to hear from you.

Take action now: Urge the National Marine Fisheries Service to enforce lifesaving protections for threatened and endangered sea turtles in the Gulf.

http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=l13kY2hlk9T5zwBB_jxV2w..



REASON to REJOICE - D&R CANAL COMMISSION TO CONTINUE

NJ WILD readers know my passion for the D&R Canal and Towpath.  For decades, as a poet, I referred to those sacred trails as “nurse, haven and muse.”

Eagle over Sculler on Lake Carnegie - D&R Canal Park - Brenda Jones

It’s never made any sense to me that we might do away with the D&R Canal Commission!  That water is our drinking water.  That historic landscape is beyond price.  The Commission costs taxpayers nothing, which people more politically astute than I can and do explain easily.  My friend and colleague at D&R Greenway, Jim Amon, is a person of the highest integrity and honor.  He served as Director of the D&R Canal Commission for thirty years before coming to us as Director of Land Stewardship.  It is to Jim’s vigilance, persistence, high aesthetic sense, and political savvy that we owe much of the beauty of that State Park.  Even the handsome ‘new’ bridge over Route 1 at Lawrenceville, designed to echo canal bridges and wrought iron signs of yesterday, wouldn’t have happened without Jim.  In all its years, the D&R Canal Commission has only missed decision deadlines ten times!  Tell us what other government agency can match this record, these accomplishments.

alexander-rd-bridge-summer-cCarolyn Foote Edelmann

Alexander Road Bridge, D&R Canal and Towpath, Full Summer   cfe

But Governor Christie said the Commission had to go. The Commission was going to be folded into NJ DEP, that same sterling bureaucracy that just brought us the inexplicable shooting of the beavers of Mountain Lakes so-called Preserve…    “And Governor Christie is an honorable man….”  (please feel full irony straight from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar in the above quote, one of my favorite speeches in all theatre…)

approaching-storm-griggstown-canal-martha-weintraub

Approaching Storm, Griggstown, D&R Canal and Towpath, Martha Weintraub

Many of us protested the evisceration of the D&R Canal Commission in various ways, –in person and through letters and in the hot links I am always urging NJ WILD readers to use.  Thank heaven especially for Jeff Tittel, head of NJ Sierra Club, for leading the charge.  Here is the result of courage and persistence.

great-blue-heron-with-fish-brenda-jones

Great Blue Heron with Fish, Lake Carnegie, D&R Canal State Park, Brenda Jones

Rejoice!


Never cease to be vigilant in terms of saving New Jersey beauty and history.

canal-early-spring-08-Carolyn Foote Edelmann

D&R Canal State Park, Mapleton Aqueduct, cfe

Senate resolution supports D&R Canal

On Thursday, the Senate Environment Committee unanimously released SR117 (Smith/Bateman), a resolution supporting the continued existence of the Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission (DRCC) and calling on the governor to authorize the commission to hire a new executive director and full-time staff.

The Assembly Environment Committee passed a similar resolution on Monday. The commission helps operate the Canal Park, which is a state and national historic district visited by 1 million people a year, and oversees land decisions that impact the state park and the water supply for 1.5 million people.

Why Keep Canal - Tasha O\'Neill

Not Only Drinking Water - Kayaker, Tasha O’Neill

“In order for the D&R Canal Commission to be an independent, professional board, the Legislature needs to support it.  The DRCC brings a planning and regional perspective to development applications along the Canal that DEP does not have when it comes to land use planning,” said Jeff Tittel, director of NJ Sierra Club.  “The Governor is trying to take over the DRCC and merge it with the DEP.  We believe that what the administration wants to do is wrong and we applaud the Legislature for moving this resolution forward.”

The DRCC has been under attack since December when DEP Commissioner Martin recommended the board be abolished under Governor Christie’s Executive Order 15.

The Sierra Club challenged the statutory authority of the governor to eliminate the DRCC and that of the DEP to dictate who the DRCC hires.  On Thursday the DRCC held a special meeting where the governor’s representative on the board outlined the administration’s plan to maintain the commission but move staff into the DEP to share resources, despite DEP staffing being at historical lows.  The representative also presents two resumes from within the DEP to fulfill the executive director position, which will be vacant on June 1, leaving the DRCC with no staff to review or process permit applications.

In response, The DRCC passed a resolution stating it will decide who it will hire for their Executive Director position.  The resolution also asked the Attorney General’s office to appoint legal representation to the Commission if the DEP and Department of Treasury did not place the new staff members on the payroll.

Having an independent regulatory land use program and board is critical not only for water quality but also for properly dealing with land use issues that affect the canal and the 400-square mile watershed.  Diminishing staff at the DEP is ill-equipped to handle the additional workload eliminating the commission would result in and would not review localized and cumulative impacts to the park as thoroughly as the commission.

The commission has established their own standards and review procedures for projects to consider natural, historic, and recreational resources of the park, and the DEP only considers regulated program areas in issuing permits.

Less than 10 percent of projects considered by the DRCC would require DEP Land Use approval and the State Historic Preservation Office only has authority over projects in the Park that receive state or federal funding and cannot protect the scenic and recreational qualities of the Park.

come-sit-a-spell-lake-carnegie-fall-08-Carolyn Foote Edelmann

Re-Creation: Come Sit a Spell, North from Mapleton Aqueduct, cfe

The commission also holds and monitors conservation easements for stream corridors prohibiting any future development, a land preservation technique that involves no expense to the state.

The 70-mile canal spans 22 municipalities in Mercer, Hunterdon, Somerset, Middlesex, and Monmouth counties. Fifteen of these municipalities and Mercer County have adopted resolutions opposing the elimination of the DRCC.

autumn-waters-brenda-jones




        Central Jersey News

  • About Author


                                     by Tasha O'Neill

    Carolyn Foote Edelmann is a poet, writer and photographer on nature, travel, history and art.

    She considers nature in general and the D&R Canal and Towpath in particular her university, mentor and constant inspiration - particularly from a kayak.

    Her quest is the wild that infuses our beleaguered state, the wild out our windows.